Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00113
Original file (PD2013 00113.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD1300113
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140206
SEPARATION DATE: 20020314


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PV2/E-2 (96H10, Common Ground Station Operator) medically separated for a left hip condition. He sustained a left femoral neck fracture in basic training which required surgical pinning and precluded the rigors of advanced individual training. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The condition was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as not meeting retention standards IAW AR 40-501, and no other conditions were submitted. The PEB adjudicated left femoral neck fracture” (noting surgical residuals) as unfitting rated at 10%, citing criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: Injury has severely impacted my way of life, physically and emotionally. I was unable to hold my children due to weight constraints, no heavy lifting, unable to stand or sit for long periods of time. … [CI elaborates severity of current symptoms and disability.] … It has caused secondary in juries . Degenerative arthrit i s, abdominal pain, radiating nerve pain down my left leg, abdominal hernias from the straining, and right hip over-compensation that is now service-connected and the use of a cane has been issued and is used frequently. I've used a cane since my discharge from serv i ce, at which time I was i ssued one at the military hospital. I still have physical limitations today , similar to those from the service. It is very painful in colder weather, and rainy wet environments.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified, but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting left hip condition (with consideration for the possibly associated degenerative arthritis and radiating nerve pain down my left leg as referenced in the contention) is addressed below. The abdominal hernias and right hip conditions referenced in the application were not identified by the MEB or PEB are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. These and any other condition or contention not requested in this application remains eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service PEB – Dated 20010212
VA* - Based on Service Treatment Records (STR)
Condition
Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Left Femoral Neck Fracture 5299-5003 10% Left Femoral Neck Fracture 5299-5255 10%** STR
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
Other x 0 STR
Combined: 10%
Combined: 10%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 21016 (most proximate to date of separation ( DOS ) )
** Rating increased to 20% by VARD dated 20101027, effective 20100129 (date of claim), based on C&P exam of 20101006.

ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected conditions continue to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate service members for anticipated future severity or potential complications (e.g., arthritis) of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws.

Left Hip Fracture. The CI experienced a sudden onset of left hip pain during a long distance ruck march near the end of basic training. He attempted to continue training and was not X-rayed until nearly 2 weeks later, when he fell and experienced severe pain with inability to ambulate. At that time he was identified with a displaced femoral neck fracture and underwent prompt open reduction with internal fixation (surgery). A secure aligned fixation was confirmed fluoroscopically. The CI was placed on profile restrictions and underwent physical therapy. The service treatment record (STR) documented significant activity limitations and a limp with the use of a cane. Range-of-motion (ROM) measurements post-operatively were initially flexion 80 degrees (normal 125, 10% minimum = 45) and external rotation of 25 degrees (normal 45, 10% minimum = 15); and, later (9 weeks pre-separation) were flexion 90 degrees and external rotation 40. There is no STR evidence for, or refuting, a compensable limitation of abduction or adduction. There is no STR evidence for, or clinical likelihood of, any nerve damage or associated arthritis at the time of separation (as relevant to the contention). The orthopedic consultant opined that long term outcome would not be compatible with military service and MEB proceedings were initiated in lieu of continuing with further training. The narrative summary (NARSUM) noted constant pain rated 4/10 exacerbated by cold weather and stair climbing. The examiner described a slight limp, favoring the right, with occasional use of a cane (crutches for severe flares). The physical exam noted a healed incision with local tenderness, and there was quadriceps atrophy with decreased left hip strength. The orthopedist opined that long term recovery to full function was unlikely, with permanent limitations of running and heavy load bearing. The recorded ROMs were flexion 80 degrees, external rotation 20 and extension 5 (normal 20, 10% minimum = 5). There is no probative post-separation VA examination in evidence.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. Although the record documents post-separation worsening of the hip condition with arthritis, arthritis was not evident at the time of separation. There was no indication of peripheral nerve injury related to the hip condition. The PEB’s 10% rating analogously to 5003 (degenerative arthritis) was not disadvantageous to rating under any of the VASRD §4.71a limitation of motion codes for the hip, although the 5 degrees extension documented in the NARSUM supports an alternative 10% rating under code 5251 (thigh, limitation of extension). The VA’s 10% rating (applying same evidence as above) was analogous to 5255 (femur, impairment of) which offers a 10% rating for slight, 20% for moderate and 30% for marked hip disability. Analogous 5299-5255 is the only available code under §4.71a which would permit a rating higher than 10% in this case. Members agreed that this analogous coding choice (5299-5255) complies with VASRD §4.7 (higher of two evaluations) and that the hip disability in evidence at separation, including all symptoms, could be fairly characterized as moderate. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the left hip condition under code 5299-5255.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the left hip condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5299-5255 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE RATING
Left Femoral Neck Fracture with Surgical Residuals 5299-5255 20%
COMBINED
20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130313, w/atchs
Exhib
it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review






AR20140013239,





Dear
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

         The Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) reviewed your application and found that your disability rating should be modified but not to the degree that would justify changing your separation for disability with severance pay to a permanent retirement with disability. I have reviewed the Board’s recommendation and record of proceedings (copy enclosed) and I accept its recommendation. This will not result in any change to your separation document or the amount of severance pay. A copy of this decision will be filed with your Physical Evaluation Board records. I regret that the facts of the case did not provide you with the outcome you may have desired.

         This decision is final. Recourse within the Department of Defense or the Department of the Army is exhausted; however, you have the option to seek relief by filing suit in a court of appropriate jurisdiction.

         A copy of this decision has also been provided to the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Sincerely,




                                                     
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

Enclosure


Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00635

    Original file (PD2012-00635.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Groin Pain Condition. In the matter of the bilateral hip condition, the Board unanimously recommends that each joint be rated as separately unfitting at 10%, coded 5019, IAW VASRD §4.71a. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX President Physical Disability Board of Review SFMR-RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency (TAPD-ZB / ), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557 SUBJECT:...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01056

    Original file (PD2011-01056.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded right hip pain secondary to femoral neck stress fracture and left sacroilitis condition on the DA Form 3947 to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. An MRI done at that time noted no evidence of a left hip stress fracture. The CI was seen in follow up by Orthopedics for left hip pain in January 2009 with findings of a positive impingement test in the anterior and posterior left hip and it was noted that the more the CI walked, there...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01143

    Original file (PD2012-01143.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1201143 SEPARATION DATE: 20021215 BOARD DATE: 20130205 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PV1/E-1 (31U10/Signal Support Systems Specialist) medically separated for chronic pain after surgical pinning of her left femoral neck stress fracture. Her left hip condition could not be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01436

    Original file (PD2013 01436.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20041026VA – 20050128 Decision based on Service Treatment Records(STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Hip Pain5099-50030%Left Femoral Neck Fracture52550%STRRight Femoral Neck Fracture52550%STRNo Additional MEB/PEB Entries Combined: 0%Combined: 0%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050128 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). The examiner noted that the CI denied pain and used no medications. In addition, the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02473

    Original file (PD-2014-02473.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left hip. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Hip Pain5299-525510%Residuals, Left Femoral Neck Fracture525520%20090504Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 8 RATING 10%RATING: 30% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20090731(most proximate to date of separation (DOS)). Left Hip Pain.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01012

    Original file (PD2012-01012.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DAF Acting Director Physical Disability Board of Review SFMR-RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02758

    Original file (PD-2014-02758.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RATING COMPARISON : IPEB – Dated 20030915VA* -based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain, Status Post-Operative Pinning of Femoral Neck Stress...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00487

    Original file (PD2012-00487.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated chronic pain, left hip, status post open reduction and internal fixation of femoral neck stress fracture as unfitting, rated 10% with cited application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: UNFITTING CONDITION Chronic Pain, Left Hip, Status Post Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Femoral...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01832

    Original file (PD-2013-01832.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SEPARATION DATE: 20050119 (2).It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but determined to be not unfitting by the PEB, when specifically requested by the CI.The rating for the unfitting left hip condition is addressed below;no other conditionsare within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board.The thyroid cancer condition was not identified by the PEB and was not diagnosed until after...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00212

    Original file (PD2013 00212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The C&P joints exam noted a hip strength of 1/5 due to pain; the C&P general examination a week later noted no muscle atrophy and a normal motor examination.The various examination findings suggest that the CI’s abnormal gaitwas due to pain from the hip, rather than muscle weakness or motor nerve injury. On exam there was tenderness of the anterior, lateral and posterior left thigh and the examiner noted the CI’s paresthesias to have hyper-esthetic and “pins and needles” components.The...